Hall-Collapse from within

Due to the inadequate leadership of Czar Nicholas II, the Russian Revolution was an overthrow from within; since the Czar did and had control over many things that caused his dynasty to fail. For instance, losing the Russo-Japanese war to Japan in 1905 was detrimental to the credibility of his leadership and the military. Although the blame is placed on the Czar for entering the limited war, the loss was unexpected. The credibility loss because of the defeat during the limited war (which is a short, less destructive war) caused a lack of belief in the government, which could only be repaired through efforts made by the Czar to re-establish credibility and confidence within the nation. His reaction to the protesters that spoke out against the loss, however, was foolishly sought out; proving that his actions caused his rule to fail. Bloody Sunday, when the Czar has protesters killed, reassured the Russian citizens why they initially lost confidence in Czar.
To compensate for his mistake, the Czar's creation of the Duma, a collection of advisers, was another failure; rather than the reparation he had intended to establish. Czar Nicholas' motive for creating the Duma was solely to restore his image; not because of his concern for the people's opinion. By failing to recognize the Duma for their intended purpose, which was like a consultation group for his decisions, the Czar created a bigger bind for himself by enabling more hatred to form against him. After Michael Rodzianko, president of the Duma, tried to warn the Czar about the crucial state of Russia and his dynasty due to his actions, the Czar replied, "Again, that fat-bellied Rodzianko has written me a load of nonsense, which I won't bother to answer." This reinforces the Czar's lack of concern for the people, and his inability to take the reins of what was in his control.
Likewise, Czar Nicholas' decision to enter World War I was ill considered, based on the poorly equipped military; as well as the leadership responsibilities entering a war entails. For example, a total war changes the social, political, and economical aspects of a country due to the mass destruction and long period of war. To indulge in such a war but not promote government intervention to help the citizens was a major problem, for people began to suffer food shortages. This displays how the revolution was a collapse from within; things the Czar had control over, such as regulating rations and food quantities for both the soldiers at war and on the home front, led the people to become disgruntled to the extreme, which ultimately led to a collapse from within the government.