Thursday, October 29, 2009

Lee Yard- An overthrow from without due to a collapse from within

The February revolution was an overthrow from without due to a collapse from within. The collapse from within began after Russia lost the Russo- Japanese war in 1905. As Russia continued the steady collapse from within the people became frustrated with their sufferings and eventually overthrew the czarist government.
The collapse from within began with the czar's actions before World War I and after. When Russia lost the Russo-Japanese war there was a since that Russia was losing its dominance in the world. In a nation full of nationalistic pride this lost had the people convinced that the czar was losing his power. Then, Russia entered World War I. The soldiers had inadequate equipment and shortages of materials (1). This showed the collapse from within because the government wasn't able to support its army. During World War I the czar decided to take supreme control of the military and left the control of Russia to the Czarina (1). This hurt the Russians on the battlefield because they were following a commander who didn't know how to run a military and it hurt the Russians back at home because they were under control of a woman, which at this time women still did not have a lot of social rights or respect. The collapse continued when the Czar created the Duma (2). The Duma was said to be a place where the people could voice their opinions and concern and have a role in the government. But the Czar ignored the request of the Duma and created it to draw attention away from the problems. The capital is at a state of anarchy, the government is paralyzed (1). This was a letter written by the leader of the Duma to the Czar talking about the problems of the government. Again, that fat-bellied Rodzianko has written me a load of nonsense, which i won't even bother to answer (1). This continued to show the collapse from within because the Czar wrote this letter to the Czarina saying that he was ignoring the Duma's letters.
Due to the conditions of the government and the Czar's actions there was a growing of opposition groups to Czarist rule (2). It didn't take long for these groups to take action and attempt to overthrow the Czarist government. In a short time the whole city was aglow (1). These opposition groups soon turn in to violent protest and riots that would eventually bring an end to the Czar. In a letter to the Czar, Alexandra says, "the striker's and rioters are in a more defiant mood than ever." (1). The people could no longer stand the suffering from shortages and the broken promises of the Czar and their anger grew as they became more impatient. When the Soviets began to gain the upper hand the people of Russia were excited that change was coming (1). This shows how the conditions of the government lead to the people's anger and lead them to overthrow the government.
The February Revolution was a combination of overthrow from without and within. It was because of the inner collapsing and continually downward spiral of the Russian government that lead to the people's frustrations and desire to overthrow the government. Because of the collapsing government it made it easy for the opposition groups to take control and get rid of the Czarist government. Czar Nicholas II lost his power when he grew apart form his citizens and was unable to support their needs.

2 comments:

  1. Leon!

    I agree with your analysis of why the people began to revolt. "The people could no longer stand the suffering from shortages and the broken promises of the Czar and their anger grew." I think that the revolution did take place because the Czar could not provide for his Russian people anymore. Also, the people were angered at the fact that Russia was still in a war that was taking a devastating toll on the country. I also agree with the Czar ignoring the Duma as being an example of collapse from within and you said that this angered the people. I agree but don't you think that this also angered the Duma? They were created to speak out for the people but were completely ignored by the Czar. Don't you think that the Czar's actions also gave the Duma a motive, not just the people?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Lee when he states that, ‘the collapse from within begin with the czar’s actions’. A piece of evidence that Lee brought to my attention showed the actions of the ‘leader’ czar. “During World War I the czar decided to take supreme control of the military and left the control of Russia to the Czarina”(1). So, once the military lost to the Japanese, he became the leader. This was a mistake and a big risk that was taken by the czar. However, it leads me to question if by czar becoming the military leader with no military experience and stepping up to the plate show some good leadership? That’s like having a basketball coach that never played basketball a day in his life and had no experience. Honestly, personally it would be hard for me to listen to what is being said if my team is on a loosing streak because the coach wouldn’t understand or know the answer to the solutions. So I couldn’t imagine what the soldiers were thinking with having an inexperienced leader while risking their own life. Czar’s lack of common sense also showed when he allowed Russia to enter into World War 1 they were, “Unprepared and poorly equipped peasants fighting” (2) . This brings me to the scenario of the football team. What coach sets their player up for the failure? That’s like Coach Belk not teaching us the material and basics that we need to know for the IB exam but allowing us to just take the test in May, expecting us to whoop their butts. Common sense tells us that that would rarely happen.

    ReplyDelete