The first of Lenin's three part mantra was peace (1). Lenin preached "Peace, land and bread" in every message (1), because he knew that this is what the people wanted. Peace was a primary goal because he believed the war was a war among capitalists (2) and one that a communist Russia would not need to be involved in. He wanted to negotiate a peace with Germany to focus on other things. He realized several things. One, that the people were tired of the war as it put strain on the industries of the country, and it drained valuable manpower away to the front lines, where the military was being shot to pieces as the country experienced leadership changes. Because of this turmoil, peace was easy enough to sell. This required no falsifying, but underneath were undertones that everything should be done the communist way, associating the end of the war with communism (Lenin's ideology) made people begin to associate communism with good things. After all, if it meant an end to the war it could mean other good things too!
The second was land. This was more of a political bribe, which was oriented at the lower class, who had the most power at the time. While the upper class had the wealth, the lower class had the numbers (and the weapons) to do pretty much what they liked, as shown by the previous rebellions. So, if you want to catch flies, use some honey. The honey offered was free land. To the poor peasants, this was a -very- radical offer, as it would give them wealth for the first time. So of course, many were willing to listen and put up with his other radical ideas in order to get the free land. The supporters would also tend to be more die-hard than other peasants, as they had some promised wealth to fight for. By essentially bribing peasants, he was able to artificially inflate his ranks, which meant new soldiers dedicated to the cause, which helped prepare the way for an uprising.
The final was bread. This was perhaps the most important of all of his offers, as bread is needed for every day life. By associating communism with wealth, food, and peace, he psychologically conditioned people to associate good things (money, no war, and food) with his group while bad things were associated with the Provisional Government (war, being poor, and being hungry). This meant that people were more likely to work with him, which was what he needed. As with most radical uprisings, he needed people that were willing to fight beside him. By offering food and money, he was able to recruit a large enough following to think of making a political gambit.
This is clearly a radical uprising. Because he did not possess the majority of power, and because of the different tactics he used (Such as locking the officials out when they did not agree with him)(1), and the violence that he maintained his power. He did not want elections because he knew that he could not win (1) and he had the military force to stop the army when it began to rebel (1). These are trademarks of a radical group (strong army, strict, and beliefs that are against the current). Because he did not achieve power democratically, we know that had it been an election he would not have achieved power, and instead he stepped into the power vacuum via force. If he was not a radical group leader, getting what he wanted under the guise of getting what the people wanted, why bother with all of the smoke and mirrors?
Smoke and mirrors would imply that he had no intentions or means to give the people what he promised, ne? But that wasn't the case. Lenin wasn't power hungry for the sake of a title, he truly wanted to help Russians after Sascha's execution...it opened his eyes. And radical group or not, they had the political support of the people. And Lenin was successful in giving the people only the things he could give, and that they needed. Smoke and mirrors would have more accurately been placed with the Tsar and Provisional Government, in my opinion. Lenin was a master tactician, something all politicians strive to be. (Extremist or otherwise.) He followed through as thoroughly as possible with all the promises he made, and didn't use the smoke and mirrors The PG and Tsar used that turned the people against them.
ReplyDeleteWhat the people needed was what Lenin offered. He followed the same path many political leaders had made to get in power and supply for his people. His ideals were exactly the things the citizens gravitated towards for a reason. And, p.s, your outlook on communism punctures my happy balloon, Comrade. ;)
I agree with Seth and not Kayla (sorry, my dear). I think smoke and mirrors is a very accurate phrase. It all comes down to a matter of opinion though...while I agree with what Kayla said about Lenin not ring power hungry solely for the sake of a title, I don't think it was necessarily for the people either. I think he was power hungry because he could be and because he had the perfect opportunity. I think it was more for his cause (Communism) than for the Russian people. I mostly just see this in the way he treated the citizens as he created concentration camps, created the Cheka, and stamped out civil liberties (3). Lenin's rule was not a democracy. It wad not for the people. It was for his cause that he believed so firmly in...the utopian society he thought communism could create.
ReplyDeleteKayla, you said that his ideals were the exact things people gravitated towards for a reason. In my opinion, that reason was just the establishment of communism and absolute power for Lenin himself.
What if you two, Kayla and Elizabeth are both right? Hmmm peace? Lenin could have started out as for the people needs like the slogan "Peace, Land, Bread"(2) implies. But then as Lenin got power, he could have (and more than likely did as do all other people of power) thought that it was nice to have power.(Ha Koon's gonna like me for this) In MacBeth, Macbeth starts out with a happy lifestyle as a Thane, but then when he gets a little taste of power, he decided that he wanted it all and starts to kill people much like Lenin and his Checka and Concentration Camps.(3) So there matter settled. Your both right in a way.
ReplyDelete“The true aims and goals of Lenin and the Bolsheviks were carefully concealed beneath a layer of what the people wanted to hear.” Woo! Seth! I love you for this sentence because I completely agree. Lenin showered the people the people with promises of civil liberties. However, Lenin did not look at what was best for the people, but what he thought was best for the people. Basically it’s like he was running a presidential election, but with only him running. And I commend him, because he was successful at what he did. The only thing that puzzles me is that if he didn’t want elections because he knew he would lose, how was he able to persuade the public to follow his ideology?
ReplyDeleteAhaha it's cool beans Elizabeth, I can see where you're coming from.
ReplyDeleteAkevian, the thing I have an issue with on your post is that Lenin didn't promise the citizens civil liberties...
And elections are hard in Russia, it's massive and was mostly illiterate and at that time technologically challenged. Also, I think Lenin knew the image he had in mind would take a while to fully mature. The immediate things would be there: the famous Peace, Land, and Bread yadda yadda. But the full ideal of his communist nation would take a while, and elections may stop the citizens from seeing that far into the future...And I think we have that problem here too- seeing the big picture. It's hard to look forward when we waste so much time obsessing over the present.