The October Revolution is a true representation of how an extremist group, known as the Bolsheviks, used smart strategies to gain the support of the people, but then took advantage of this support to sussessfully seize total power through the use of strong armed tactics.
In Lenin’s April Theses, Lenin proposes drastic change giving power to the Soviets, at which the bourgeoisie held. The document states, “…led to the assumption of power by the bourgeoisie-to its second stage which is to place power in the hands of the proletariat and the poorest strata of the peasantry…” (4).The bourgeoisie were known as the rich, intelligent merchants, who were minorities of Russia. However, the majorities were the proletariat, also known as the workers. The fact that Lenin is giving power to the workers would easily make the workers support him because he is making them believe that they will have a better life. In order for one to come in power, he must gain the support of the people. Knowing that the workers were the majority, he knew that they were the main group he needed to get the support from. Not only did he gain support from the workers, but also from the peasants. In his April Theses he proposed that there would be “A separate organization of Soviets of Deputies of the poorest peasants” (4). This means that the peasants who were not represented in the past would be represented also, so they would have a voice too. So, basically Lenin’s April Theses was designed to give all power to the Soviets. The fact that the April Theses gave Lenin support from the soviets, would indeed make a historian believe that this theses was the main strategy designed to gain support of the majorities, and when he gain most support, it easily gave him the opportunity to seize all power.
Once the support was gained, Lenin gained little power. Therefore he took advantage of this opportunity to seize power. However, seizing power was not an easy job for him, so he had to use strong armed tactics, two at which were the creation of the Cheka, also known as the secret police, and establishing concentration camps (3). The Cheka had many tasks, one at which their job was“To suppress and liquidate all attempts and acts of counterrevolution and sabotage throughout Russia, from whatever quarter” (3). The Cheka was the basic force that suppressed all oppressors, some at which were killed. They were a secret institution, so people would not know if a person was apart of it or not. Therefore, it was easier for them to catch those who were speaking out against the Bolsheviks. Once they were caught, they were eliminated and it made it less difficult for Lenin and the Bolsheviks seize all power. A historian would easily interpret this as a transformation of Lenin and the Bolsheviks, showing how they gained the support, but then took advantage of the support to seize power. The establishment of the concentration camps was another tactic used to seize power. Not only did it get rid of oppressors by placing them in the camps, but it also was a symbol of terror. Once people learned of the camps, the thoughts of being in the camps would scare them to the point that they would do what they needed to do to not go there. Therefore, if supporting Lenin means not being sent to the camps, some would support him, enabling him to easily seize the control.
Many people were killed during the October Revolution because they were speaking out against Lenin and the Bolsheviks. Lenin went from a friend of the Soviets, making them think that they were going to see a huge change in their favor, to a greedy dictator, who wanted all power and would do whatever it takes to get it. Lenin only wrote the April These to gain the support of the Soviets, but once he gain power, the April These was thrown out the window. It was only a strategy designed to gain the support of the people, and once he gained the support he took advantage of the opportunity to seize power and be in control.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
TOYA!
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with this. It makes you a bit angry because when Lenin's strategy is broken down, he's VERY sneaky. Question to think about though, do you think that even if after the voting and the people were given the power, would it be good for Russia, who already has an instable government?! Just to think. But I definently agree with you and the reason why Lenin wrote the April Thesis. Sneaky fella I tell you.
No, for Russia's stake it would have been better if they were ruled under one, but they have to be smart about who they choose to lead. Once Lenin made it in, he went bananas to get the power. I believe they would have been better off with a leader, but just a better leader. But since no one else, other than Lenin stepped up to the plate, like smart, intelligent worker, Lenin was all they had. But maybe it would have just been better if they stuck with the provisional government. What you think?? I guess we will never really know what would have been better for Russia!
ReplyDeleteI agree with your thesis for the most part but don't agree with some of it. His April Theses was meant to appeal to the people and give power to the Soviets at the same time, but I don't think he ever actually gained the support of the people or workers. Source 3 states, "The victors, with 40 percent of the ballet, were the Social Revolutionaries, who stood for giving land to the peasants. The Bolsheviks' electoral defeat was just what Lenin expected, and for that reason-no matter what he had said earlier-he had no intention of letting the Constituent Assembly meet." So he actually never gained power through elections, nor support. The Social Revolutionaries were the party that gained the most support of the people, and peasants in particular. So since he could not fairly earn support and power, he took it. He took power through strong-armed tactics, like a coup using weapons. His establishment of the Cheka and concentration camps was a way to maintain the power he forcefully took. So he did try and suscribe to the needs of the people, but when that failed and he never gained the majority of the support needed, resorted to strong-armed tactics to seize power.
ReplyDelete